污染的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列包括價格和評價等資訊懶人包

Introduction to Emerging Fields in Materials Sustainability

為了解決污染的問題，作者Ramakrishna, Seeram,Tamil Selvan, Ramadoss,Pathak, Pankaj 這樣論述：

探討發展都市農園於改善熱島效應-以旱溪為例

為了解決污染的問題，作者張玟豫 這樣論述：

台灣地狹人稠，人口和產業朝向都市集中的趨勢更為明顯，都市化程度已高達 79.9％。行政院經濟建設委員會所建構的「台灣永續發展指標系統」中也特別區分出都市台灣 (Urban Taiwan) 的體系，足見都市的發展攸關整體環境的永續性。美國亞利桑那州立大學聯合全球各地的大專機構，透過大數據的蒐集，計量倘若全球各城市全面實施都市農業，每年可生產多達1.8億噸糧食，也可以緩解都市熱島效應，本研究針對都市農園之永續發展以旱溪的鳥竹圍公園為例進行設計，藉由台中市政府推行的綠美化政策提升人均綠地面積，針對旱溪周遭綠地與裸地和公園尋找適合的場地，研究工具應用都市設計審議綠化量得降溫有效的計算，對都市熱

島效應的了解，從一個綜觀的角度來檢視都市的發展是否符合環境永續性的要求，包括能源使用、水泥化程度、綠覆率、水循環和空氣污染等。若能在都市閒置土地增加農園，便能為當地帶來糧食生產與經濟效益，易能減緩都市熱島效應。

The Politics of Trash: How Governments Used Corruption to Clean Cities, 1890-1929

為了解決污染的問題，作者Strach, Patricia,Sullivan, Kathleen S. 這樣論述：

The Politics of Trash explains how municipal trash collection solved odorous urban problems using nongovernmental and often unseemly means. Focusing on the persistent problems of filth and the frustration of generations of reformers unable to clean their cities, Patricia Strach and Kathleen S. Su

llivan tell a story of dirty politics and administrative innovation that made rapidly expanding American cities livable. The solutions that professionals recommended to rid cities of overflowing waste cans, litter-filled privies, and animal carcasses were largely ignored by city governments. When th

e efforts of sanitarians, engineers, and reformers failed, public officials turned to the habits and tools of corruption as well as to gender and racial hierarchies.Corruption often provided the political will for public officials to establish garbage collection programs. Effective waste collection

involves translating municipal imperatives into new habits and arrangements in homes and other private spaces. To change domestic habits, officials relied on gender hierarchy to make the women of the white, middle-class households in charge of sanitation. When public and private trash cans overflowe

d, racial and ethnic prejudices were harnessed to single out scavengers, garbage collectors, and neighborhoods by race. These early informal efforts were slowly incorporated into formal administrative processes that created the public-private sanitation systems that prevail in most American cities t

oday. The Politics of Trash locates these hidden resources of governments to challenge presumptions about the formal mechanisms of governing and recovers the presence of residents at the margins, whose experiences can be as overlooked as garbage collection itself. This consideration of municipal gar

bage collection reveals how political development often relies on undemocratic means with long-term implications for further inequality. Focusing on the resources that cleaned American cities also shows the tenuous connection between political development and modernization.