504 507 5W-40的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列包括價格和評價等資訊懶人包

國立臺北科技大學 電資學院外國學生專班(iEECS) 白敦文所指導 VAIBHAV KUMAR SUNKARIA的 An Integrated Approach For Uncovering Novel DNA Methylation Biomarkers For Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma (2022),提出504 507 5W-40關鍵因素是什麼,來自於Lung Cancer、LUAD、LUSC、NSCLC、DNA methylation、Comorbidity Disease、Biomarkers、SCT、FOXD3、TRIM58、TAC1。

而第二篇論文國立高雄大學 金融管理學系碩士班 王文楷所指導 林冠穎的 依投資組合價值調整之簡單Delta避險策略 : 以台指選擇權為例 (2021),提出因為有 選擇權避險的重點而找出了 504 507 5W-40的解答。

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了504 507 5W-40,大家也想知道這些:

An Integrated Approach For Uncovering Novel DNA Methylation Biomarkers For Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma

為了解決504 507 5W-40的問題,作者VAIBHAV KUMAR SUNKARIA 這樣論述:

Introduction - Lung cancer is one of primal and ubiquitous cause of cancer related fatalities in the world. Leading cause of these fatalities is non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a proportion of 85%. The major subtypes of NSCLC are Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and Lung Small Cell Carcinoma (LUS

C). Early-stage surgical detection and removal of tumor offers a favorable prognosis and better survival rates. However, a major portion of 75% subjects have stage III/IV at the time of diagnosis and despite advanced major developments in oncology survival rates remain poor. Carcinogens produce wide

spread DNA methylation changes within cells. These changes are characterized by globally hyper or hypo methylated regions around CpG islands, many of these changes occur early in tumorigenesis and are highly prevalent across a tumor type.Structure - This research work took advantage of publicly avai

lable methylation profiling resources and relevant comorbidities for lung cancer patients extracted from meta-analysis of scientific review and journal available at PubMed and CNKI search which were combined systematically to explore effective DNA methylation markers for NSCLC. We also tried to iden

tify common CpG loci between Caucasian, Black and Asian racial groups for identifying ubiquitous candidate genes thoroughly. Statistical analysis and GO ontology were also conducted to explore associated novel biomarkers. These novel findings could facilitate design of accurate diagnostic panel for

practical clinical relevance.Methodology - DNA methylation profiles were extracted from TCGA for 418 LUAD and 370 LUSC tissue samples from patients compared with 32 and 42 non-malignant ones respectively. Standard pipeline was conducted to discover significant differentially methylated sites as prim

ary biomarkers. Secondary biomarkers were extracted by incorporating genes associated with comorbidities from meta-analysis of research articles. Concordant candidates were utilized for NSCLC relevant biomarker candidates. Gene ontology annotations were used to calculate gene-pair distance matrix fo

r all candidate biomarkers. Clustering algorithms were utilized to categorize candidate genes into different functional groups using the gene distance matrix. There were 35 CpG loci identified by comparing TCGA training cohort with GEO testing cohort from these functional groups, and 4 gene-based pa

nel was devised after finding highly discriminatory diagnostic panel through combinatorial validation of each functional cluster.Results – To evaluate the gene panel for NSCLC, the methylation levels of SCT(Secritin), FOXD3(Forkhead Box D3), TRIM58(Tripartite Motif Containing 58) and TAC1(Tachikinin

1) were tested. Individually each gene showed significant methylation difference between LUAD and LUSC training cohort. Combined 4-gene panel AUC, sensitivity/specificity were evaluated with 0.9596, 90.43%/100% in LUAD; 0.949, 86.95%/98.21% in LUSC TCGA training cohort; 0.94, 85.92%/97.37 in GEO 66

836; 0.91,89.17%/100% in GEO 83842 smokers; 0.948, 91.67%/100% in GEO83842 non-smokers independent testing cohort. Our study validates SCT, FOXD3, TRIM58 and TAC1 based gene panel has great potential in early recognition of NSCLC undetermined lung nodules. The findings can yield universally accurate

and robust markers facilitating early diagnosis and rapid severity examination.

依投資組合價值調整之簡單Delta避險策略 : 以台指選擇權為例

為了解決504 507 5W-40的問題,作者林冠穎 這樣論述:

本文旨在探討選擇權之delta避險策略,主要討論之避險策略為依投資組合價值調整之避險策略(value-based),其調整方式是依照投資組合價值變動比率進行調整。首先利用蒙地卡羅法模擬標的價格,並對提出依投資組合價值調整之避險策略和依時間調整之避險策略(time-based)進行測試,接著再以台灣加權股價指數選擇(TXO)進行實證測試,而本文對避險績效的評估指標是避險誤差以及避險誤差之標準差,另外對交易成本的評估指標為現貨部位之調整價值與調整次數。本研究之結果,在蒙地卡羅法的避險測試之結果顯示,本文策略在適當的調整比率下,避險績效可以達到與依時間調整之避險策略相同水準,而本文策略又有更低的交

易成本,因此可以說明本文策略優於依時間調整之避險策略;在實證結果中顯示,在一些調整比率下的本文策略能夠在避險績效與交易成本的指標上都勝過依時間調整之避險策略。綜觀以上研究結果,期望本篇研究對需要利用選擇權避險的投資人能有所幫助,並對delta避險策略之發展有所貢獻。