Civic 2019的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列包括價格和評價等資訊懶人包

The Civic Education Crisis: How We Got Here, What We Must Do

為了解決Civic 2019的問題，作者Sikkenga, Jeffrey,Davenport, David 這樣論述：

Jeffrey Sikkenga is the Executive Director of the Ashbrook Center and a professor of political science at Ashland University. He has been a Senior Fellow at the Program on Constitutionalism and Democracy at the University of Virginia as well as a Visiting Scholar at the Hoover Institution at Stanfor

d University. He is the author or coauthor of three books: The Supreme Court: Core Decisions (2020), History of American Political Thought (2019), and The Free Person and the Free Economy (2002). He lives in Ashland, OH. David Davenport is a Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford Uni

versity as well as a Senior Fellow at the Ashbrook Center. He is the former president of Pepperdine University (1985-2000), where he also served as a professor of law and public policy. David is the coauthor with Gordon Lloyd of three books: How Public Policy Became War (2019), Rugged Individualism:

Dead or Alive? (2017), and The New Deal and Modern American Conservatism: A Defining Rivalry (2013). He lives in Coronado, CO

Civic 2019進入發燒排行的影片

華德福學校的美感教育實踐： 以照海華德福戲劇課程為例

為了解決Civic 2019的問題，作者鄭依旻 這樣論述：

本研究旨在探討華德福學校中的美感教育，闡釋其源流脈絡及發展，藉此開啟與台灣美感教育的對話。以新竹照海華德福為研究個案，並以其中的戲劇課為嵌入式分析單位，深入探究華德福美感教育的實踐，透過訪談、觀察及資料分析，對應亞太地區美感教育研究室所提出之美感三軸，最後綜合歸納，提出實踐的觀點與方法。本研究結果顯示：一、華德福戲劇課是從音樂、詩歌跟造型藝術等整合一起後發展而來，因此戲劇教學也適合在不同課程中展開。課程雖然從中年級後才有安排，但從幼兒時期即藉由感官的發展開啟，經由模仿自然環境啟發美感經驗。二、戲劇課美感經驗，藉由自然環境空間及師生的感官發展與模仿，在存有空間共創，也使學生認同並關心生活環境。

三、美感經驗的發展也展現在華德福教育其他的課程脈絡中，皆從身體出發，注重身、心、靈發展的平衡，感知世界並創造，最終達到人智學教育的目標──了解人的本質。四、對應亞太地區美感教育研究室美感三軸之存在美學、生態美學、公民美學，照海華德福戲劇課實踐了存在美學與生態美學之美感圖像，並在課程外展現出公民美學的理念，課程內容的設計、教師的教學方式，可作為台灣表演藝術課的借鏡，從不同面向思考課程發展上的問題與困難。

Together We Decide: An Essential Guide for Making Good Group Decisions

為了解決Civic 2019的問題，作者Freshley, Craig 這樣論述：

Does your group need help making good decisions?​Whether your organization is large or small, public or private, simple or complex, all groups of people must make decisions to move their agendas forward. And to ensure the ongoing health of your group, those decisions need to be optimal. With tips, u

nderlying principles, and case studies in his definitive book, Craig Freshley shares the essentials that groups of all sizes need to make sure their decisions will last and provide benefits for all members. This friendly, practical, and authoritative guide from an experienced and successful facilita

tor/trainer is a must-have for groups or individuals who want to work on consensus and their collaborative decision-making skills. Leaders, board members, and senior staff in the nonprofit sector--where there’s often a higher expectation of collaboration--and corporate leaders who have a collaborati

ve, inclusive mindset or culture will find this hook especially valuable. Topics include: - Collaboration is underrated and competition is overrated. - Making collaborative decisions (good group decisions) is as much or more about attitude as it is mechanics. - When you separate process from substan

ce (putting process in the hands of a facilitator and substance in the hands of everyone else), the process is better, and the end decision (the substance) will be better. - There are proven techniques and best practices that improve meetings and the decision-making processes. Anyone can learn how t

o turn processes and meetings from bad to good. - Humility is important. Every one of us is part of a group, and not one of us knows what’s best for all of us. - Making peace is harder than making war. It’s easier to be mad at your neighbor than to talk to your neighbor. We shouldn’t expect peacemak

ing (or productive meetings) to be easy. These things are not easy. And yet they are totally worth it when done right. - Collaboration isn’t just the right thing to do in a moral sort of way; it’s intensely practical for achieving true innovation, creativity, and breakthrough results. - Critical for

group decision-making efficiency is how to apply the right method at the right scale to fit the magnitude of the decision at hand. Freshley’s message is especially pertinent to today’s world: When good decisions are implemented properly, their effects will be long lasting--for people, for groups, a

nd for the world. Craig Freshley is a professional meeting facilitator, speaker, trainer, and author with an inspiring attitude and a well-earned reputation for helping groups be efficient, harmonious, and productive. He has professionally facilitated over 3,000 meetings where he helped groups pro

duce indispensable good decisions. Craig works with a wide range of clients including businesses, governments, and non-profits of all sizes and in all sectors. Craig has bachelor’s degrees in Political Science and Philosophy from the University of Maine, and a master’s degree in Public Policy and Ma

nagement from the Muskie School for Public Service. He also worked for the Maine State Planning Office and for the Maine Development Foundation. In 2019 Craig won the American Civic Collaboration Award for creating and facilitating Make Shift Coffee Houses: face-to-face places where conservatives, l

iberals, and all kinds of people meet to talk and understand each other’s political views.

組織公民行為研究之文獻計量分析

為了解決Civic 2019的問題，作者蔡明施 這樣論述：

為探究組織公民行為研究之文獻發展趨勢、知識結構及新興議題，本研究以文獻計量學分析為方法，分別使用Scopus索摘引文資料庫與臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫（TCI-HSS）作為文獻來源，進行文獻探勘，以「組織公民行為」（Organizational Citizenship Behavior）、「角色外行為」(extra-role behavior)搭配教育（education*)、學校(school)或教師(teacher)為主題詞檢索，限縮於「期刊文獻」（Article）及「回顧型文獻」（Review）範疇，年份不限，最終檢索結果分別納入Scopus（2,666篇）為1983年至2021

年間發表及TCI-HSS（77篇）為2001年至2020年間發表之文獻資料。本研究以VOSviewer及CiteSpace書目軟體作為分析工具，利用聚類分析技術（Cluster analysis）和繪圖（Mapping）功能，藉由國家、機構、作者引文分析及作者、文獻、期刊的共被引分析、關鍵詞共現分析，將文獻資料可視化，並繪製科學知識圖譜，對組織公民行為研究的整體發展脈絡進行梳理，分析其研究熱點變化趨勢，推測其前沿動態。研究結果發現，組織公民行為研究，以美國、中國大陸及英國為研究重鎮，具有強大的影響力，以色列海法大學、美國印第安那大學布隆明頓分校及美國密西根州立大學為重要的研究機構。「Journ

al of Applied Psychology」為組織公民行為研究之指標性期刊，深具權威性。高被引文獻作者為Dennis W Organ、Philip Michael Podsakoff、Scott Bradley MacKenzie、Robert H. Moorman及Linn Van Dyne等人；文獻共被引分析之2個有效聚類「組織公民行為之概念定義、前因後果、構面分類與量表發展及研究方法」及「組織公民行為的構面再定義、社會交換理論完整回顧、結構方程模型的評估及提出對行為研究中常見的方法偏差及建議補救方法」為組織公民行為研究之知識基礎。高頻次關鍵字「工作滿意度」、「組織承諾」、「領導者與

成員交換理論」、「轉型領導」、「組織公平」及關鍵字共現分析五個有效聚類「組織公民行為」、「心理賦權」、「組織特性」、「離職傾向」及「員工態度」為研究熱點。Koopman等人（2016）的文獻自2016年至今仍持續突現，文中探討組織公民行為之光明面和黑暗面：對幫助他人的好處和代價的日常調查的議題，為研究前沿之一；「量化」、「企業社會責任」、「工作敬業」、「環境導向組織公民行為」、「心理資本」及「敬業心」等六個高突現關鍵詞持續突現，亦為研究前沿之一。本研究綜合研究結果，提出具體建議，作為教育人員提昇學校行政管理相關知能及未來研究之參考。