污染防制的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列包括價格和評價等資訊懶人包

Introduction to Emerging Fields in Materials Sustainability

為了解決污染防制的問題，作者Ramakrishna, Seeram,Tamil Selvan, Ramadoss,Pathak, Pankaj 這樣論述：

利用樹莓派進行物聯網環境檢測系統之研究

為了解決污染防制的問題，作者詹恩傑 這樣論述：

隨著發展物質需求的提升、汽機車需求也增加，城市化帶了便利，也衍生了的嚴重環境污染及空氣質量污染的問題。室內可能是室外汙染的2.5倍，時甚至100倍。因此室內空氣污染物對人體健康影響相當重要，要有效的改善室內空氣品質，才能維護人體的生活健康。 本研究採用樹梅派、PMS5003T等感測器，製作出空氣檢測系統，整合成一個App可同時觀看當前數據。使用相關電子元件及繼電器可控制家電，以清潔、流通空氣來改善空氣品質。

The Politics of Trash: How Governments Used Corruption to Clean Cities, 1890-1929

為了解決污染防制的問題，作者Strach, Patricia,Sullivan, Kathleen S. 這樣論述：

The Politics of Trash explains how municipal trash collection solved odorous urban problems using nongovernmental and often unseemly means. Focusing on the persistent problems of filth and the frustration of generations of reformers unable to clean their cities, Patricia Strach and Kathleen S. Su

llivan tell a story of dirty politics and administrative innovation that made rapidly expanding American cities livable. The solutions that professionals recommended to rid cities of overflowing waste cans, litter-filled privies, and animal carcasses were largely ignored by city governments. When th

e efforts of sanitarians, engineers, and reformers failed, public officials turned to the habits and tools of corruption as well as to gender and racial hierarchies.Corruption often provided the political will for public officials to establish garbage collection programs. Effective waste collection

involves translating municipal imperatives into new habits and arrangements in homes and other private spaces. To change domestic habits, officials relied on gender hierarchy to make the women of the white, middle-class households in charge of sanitation. When public and private trash cans overflowe

d, racial and ethnic prejudices were harnessed to single out scavengers, garbage collectors, and neighborhoods by race. These early informal efforts were slowly incorporated into formal administrative processes that created the public-private sanitation systems that prevail in most American cities t

oday. The Politics of Trash locates these hidden resources of governments to challenge presumptions about the formal mechanisms of governing and recovers the presence of residents at the margins, whose experiences can be as overlooked as garbage collection itself. This consideration of municipal gar

bage collection reveals how political development often relies on undemocratic means with long-term implications for further inequality. Focusing on the resources that cleaned American cities also shows the tenuous connection between political development and modernization.